TL;DR
Get movie nights delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman ruled that former federal prosecutor Maurene Comey was unlawfully fired from her New York job in July 2025. He ordered her retroactive reinstatement and back pay through Dec. 20, rejecting the government’s argument that the president has conclusive authority to remove federal prosecutors. The Justice Department had not immediately commented.
U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman ruled Monday that Maurene Comey was unlawfully fired from her job as a federal prosecutor in New York in July 2025, and ordered her retroactive reinstatement and back pay through Dec. 20. The decision rejects the government’s argument that prosecutors exercise powers reserved to the president and therefore can be removed without the limits Congress may set.
Comey, the daughter of former FBI director James Comey, had worked as an assistant U.S. attorney for a decade. Furman noted her work on high-profile cases and that she had received “the highest accolades from supervisors and peers alike.” After she was dismissed, she sued the Justice Department and other defendants, arguing that the termination violated the Constitution’s separation-of-powers protections, the First Amendment and the Fifth Amendment’s due-process clause.
In the ruling, Furman rejected the government’s position that federal prosecutors could be removed because they exercise the president’s “conclusive and preclusive” powers. He said the argument that Congress cannot regulate prosecutors’ removal “flies in the face of nearly two centuries of Supreme Court precedent.” The judge ordered retroactive reinstatement and back pay from the date of her firing through Dec. 20, saying the remedy was intended to “make her whole” and prevent adverse employment consequences from the termination.
Comey alleged that she was fired because she is James Comey’s daughter, or because of her perceived political affiliation and beliefs, according to the judge’s account of her claims. Those explanations are allegations advanced in her lawsuit; the ruling’s stated basis is its rejection of the government’s removal-power argument. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to The Guardian’s request for comment. Comey’s lawyers praised the decision in a statement.
Limits on Presidential Removal Power
The decision addresses whether the executive branch can remove career federal prosecutors without regard to limits established by Congress. Furman’s ruling rejects the government’s broad claim about presidential authority, invoking a long history of Supreme Court precedent and the constitutional balance between branches. The case could matter beyond Comey because it concerns protections and remedies available to federal employees facing removal.
The order also has direct consequences for Comey’s employment record and pay. The judge said retroactive reinstatement and back pay through Dec. 20 would help prevent the firing from producing adverse employment effects. The ruling does not, on the information reported, establish that her family connection or perceived political views caused the dismissal; it determines that the government’s asserted basis for unrestricted removal was legally wrong.
Popular right now
iRobot Roomba Max 715 Pet Robot Vacuum with AutoEmpty Dock
Breville Barista Pro Espresso Machine with Grinder, Brushed Stainless Steel
KitchenAid Artisan Series 5-Quart Tilt-Head Stand Mixer, Dried Rose (KSM150PS)
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Comey’s Firing and the Lawsuit
The firing took place in July 2025, during the Trump administration. Comey had spent about 10 years as an assistant U.S. attorney in New York and worked on some nationally prominent cases. She brought suit after her dismissal, challenging it under several constitutional provisions and asserting that her family relationship and perceived political beliefs played a role.
The Guardian reported that the Justice Department had dismissed scores of career employees, including prosecutors and FBI agents, who had taken part in investigations involving President Donald Trump or were viewed as opposing the administration’s agenda. Some affected employees have pursued federal lawsuits. Comey’s case drew particular attention because her father, James Comey, had a long-running adversarial relationship with Trump. Trump fired him as FBI director in 2017, and has repeatedly called for him to be jailed.
The report also notes that an earlier criminal case against James Comey, accusing him of lying to Congress in 2020, was dismissed after a judge found that the prosecutor who brought the charges had been illegally appointed. A separate indictment remains pending over an Instagram image involving seashells arranged as “8647”; James Comey has sought to dismiss that case. These proceedings are separate from Maurene Comey’s employment lawsuit.
Appeal and Employment Details
The available report does not say whether the Justice Department will appeal, and the department had not responded to a request for comment at publication. It is also unclear from the report how the ordered reinstatement will be implemented in practice, including Comey’s immediate work status. The ruling’s precise scope beyond the stated back-pay period and protections against adverse employment consequences is not described in the source material.
Comey’s lawsuit included claims that the firing was tied to her family relationship and perceived political affiliation or beliefs. The report does not establish those motives as fact, nor does it detail whether Furman resolved each constitutional claim separately. Further court filings or statements from the parties may clarify those points.
Possible Appeal and Court Orders
The next immediate development is whether the Justice Department challenges Furman’s ruling. No appeal was reported as of Monday, and the department had not commented. If the government appeals, a higher court could review the judge’s interpretation of Congress’s authority to regulate the removal of federal prosecutors.
The parties will also need to address the practical effect of the order, including the retroactive reinstatement and payment of back wages through Dec. 20. Further details may come through court filings or statements from Comey’s lawyers and the department. Until then, the confirmed outcome is Furman’s ruling and the remedy he ordered; any appeal or later change to that outcome remains unconfirmed.
Key Questions
What did the judge decide?
Judge Jesse Furman ruled that Maurene Comey’s July 2025 firing was unlawful. He rejected the government’s argument that federal prosecutors could be removed under the president’s conclusive and preclusive powers.
What remedy did the judge order?
Furman ordered retroactive reinstatement and back pay from the date Comey was fired through Dec. 20, saying the remedy was intended to make her whole and prevent adverse employment consequences.
Did the judge find that Comey was fired because of her father?
Comey alleged that she was dismissed because she is James Comey’s daughter or because of her perceived political affiliation and beliefs. The report does not establish those motives as fact; it identifies the judge’s rejection of the government’s broad removal-power argument as the basis of the ruling.
Will the Justice Department appeal?
That is not known. The department had not immediately responded to a request for comment, and no appeal was reported in the source material.
Source: theguardian.com
